<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>nonpatents.org</title> <atom:link href="http://www.nonpatents.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.nonpatents.org</link> <description>Nothing but prior art.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Reprap Redux: Notes on Assembling the Mendel Prusa</title><link>http://www.nonpatents.org/2012/04/reprap-redux-notes-on-assembling-the-mendel-prusa/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=reprap-redux-notes-on-assembling-the-mendel-prusa</link> <comments>http://www.nonpatents.org/2012/04/reprap-redux-notes-on-assembling-the-mendel-prusa/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:14:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>haydn@nonpatents.org</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[3d printing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[how-to]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nonpatents]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpatents.org/?p=16</guid> <description><![CDATA[If, like me, you want to familiarize yourself with the ongoing explosion of affordable 3D printers, probably the best way to start is by building one yourself. MakerBot offers easy-assembly commercial desktop printers, but the discerning masochistic autodidact will prefer the classically hobbyist-oriented RepRap Mendel Prusa from MakerGear with its intricate parts and from-scratch, learn-as-you-go [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If, like me, you want to familiarize yourself with the ongoing explosion of affordable 3D printers, probably the best way to start is by building one yourself. <a
href="http://www.makerbot.com/" target="_blank">MakerBot</a> offers easy-assembly commercial desktop printers, but the discerning masochistic autodidact will prefer the classically hobbyist-oriented <a
href="http://reprap.org/wiki/Main_Page" target="_blank">RepRap</a> <a
href="http://www.makergear.com/products/3d-printers" target="_blank">Mendel Prusa</a> from MakerGear with its intricate parts and from-scratch, learn-as-you-go ethos. One kit, with a build envelope of about 20cm*20cm*14cm, will set you back about $900 (depending on what tools you already have and whether you order any parts pre-assembled). Assembly took up most of my Saturdays for a period of about 3 months; YMMV.</p><p>Documentation is plentiful &mdash; too plentiful, really, as there is no central or canonical source of information. Expect to encounter descriptions of earlier versions — of the hardware, of the electronics, and of the soft- and firm- ware. Really the only resources you need, instruction-wise, are the Mendel Prusa <a
href="http://garyhodgson.com/reprap/prusa-mendel-visual-instructions/" target="_blank">Visual Instruction Guide</a>, its MakerGear-specific <a
href="http://www.makergear.com/pages/makergear-prusa-mendel-instructions" target="_blank">amendments and addenda</a>, and the assembly notes on <a
href="http://brazenartifice.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Brazen Artifice</a>. I suggest reading Brazen Artifice first, to get an idea what you&#8217;re getting yourself into.</p><p>Those guides are for the most part very detailed, and lacking only in brevity. A brief overview of the build process:</p><ul><li>Hardware assembly. This is by far the easiest part &mdash; it may be time-consuming, but the instructions are very straightforward and each step is reversible, so it&#8217;s near-impossible to make any significant mistakes.</li><li>Electronics assembly. This was by far the most frustrating part. I strongly recommend the $50 pre-assembled <a
href="http://reprap.org/wiki/Arduino_Mega_Pololu_Shield" target="_blank">RAMPS</a> upgrade.</li><li>Wiring. Straightforward but nervous as you try to avoid overvoltages &#038; short circuits.</li><li>Calibration &#038; tuning. This was/is not particularly difficult, but is a never-ending process (what&#8217;s that noise? how do I reduce unnecessary infill? etc.)</li></ul><p>Happy printing!</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonpatents.org/2012/04/reprap-redux-notes-on-assembling-the-mendel-prusa/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Wind-powered Hot Air Balloon</title><link>http://www.nonpatents.org/2011/10/wind-powered-hot-air-balloon/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wind-powered-hot-air-balloon</link> <comments>http://www.nonpatents.org/2011/10/wind-powered-hot-air-balloon/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 22:35:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>haydn@nonpatents.org</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[flying machines]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nonpatents]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpatents.org/?p=5</guid> <description><![CDATA[Patents annoy me. While I have no doubt that once upon a time the patent system genuinely did foster innovation, lately it&#8217;s been doing anything but; and while open-source tools have brought the cost of developing many patentable inventions or processes down almost to zero, particularly in software, the cost of obtaining a patent is [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patents annoy me.</p><p>While I have no doubt that once upon a time the patent system genuinely did foster innovation, lately it&#8217;s been doing <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_troll" target="_blank">anything but</a>; and while open-source tools have brought the cost of developing many patentable inventions or processes down almost to zero, particularly in software, the <a
href="http://www.richardspatentlaw.com/faq/how-much-does-a-patent-cost/" target="_blank">cost of obtaining</a> a patent is still well above the average person&#8217;s ability to pay.</p><p>Luckily, there&#8217;s a loophole: <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_art">prior art</a>. Anything published in any medium which describes something patentable cannot itself be patented. So, if I start a blog and publish details describing a wind-powered hot air balloon — that is, a system which generates lift by converting wind energy to heat energy, which is as far as I can tell an original invention — no one can legally receive a patent on such a system.</p><p>Will it work? I don&#8217;t know.<br
/> Has anyone tried it? I don&#8217;t think so.<br
/> Will I make money? That would be nice, but I&#8217;d rather see people do cool things with the idea.</p><p>Plans so far are up on Thingiverse — the generator: <a
href="http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:12325">http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:12325</a> and full turbine assembly: <a
href="http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:12326">http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:12326</a> . The idea is to attach a hairdryer and balloon to the generator; I&#8217;ll post more details as the plan progresses.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonpatents.org/2011/10/wind-powered-hot-air-balloon/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
